Window 7 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 20 April 2007

Understanding Stealth Malware

Posted on 06:18 by Unknown


Ever wondered whether Blue Pill really works or was just a PR stunt? Ever wanted to see how practical are various timing attacks against it? (And can even those “unpractical” be cheated?) Or how many Blue Pills inside each other can you run and still be able to play your favorite 3D game smoothly? Or how deep Alex can hook into Windows NDIS to bypass your personal firewall? Do you want to see Patch Guard from a “bird’s eye view” perspective? Or do you simply want to find out how well the latest Vista x64 kernel is protected? Ever wondered how rootkits like Deepdoor and Firewalk really worked? You can’t sleep, because you’re thinking constantly about how Blue Pill-like malware can be prevented? Does Northbridge hacking sound sexy to you? :)

At the very end of July, during the Black Hat Briefings in Las Vegas, Alex Tereshkin and I will be running a training “Understanding Stealth Malware”, where you should be able to find answers to the above questions plus many more.

The training will feature many previously unpublished techniques, implementation details, and of course lots of brand new code, developed especially for the training. The code will include sample rootkits similar to Deepdoor, Firewalk, Blue Pill and Delusion (but redesigned and rewritten from scratch) as well as some more exotic things, like e.g. anti-hardware-forensic attacks.

As the training will be focused on Windows platform and Vista x64 specifically, we will also present some new kernel attacks against latest Vista x64 builds. These attacks, of course, work on the fly and do not require system reboot and are not afraid of the TPM/Bitlocker protection. (Although they could also be used to bypass Vista DRM protection, this subject will not be discussed during the training).

Attendees will mostly work with kernel debuggers in order to analyze and understand various techniques used in system compromises. The main goal of the training is to help students understand contemporary malware techniques, enable them to see the “bigger picture” over technical details and show possible approaches to compromise detection.

Thus the course is primarily targeted for developers of security products, forensic investigators, pen-testers and OS developers. It’s recommended that attendees have a basic knowledge of OS design and implementation (specifically Windows), C programming, at least basic experience with debugging and ability to understand fragments of assembler code (IA32 architecture).

For ethical reasons we want to limit the availability of this course to only "legitimate" companies, thus we require that you specify your official business email address and company's website when registering for the course.

Pre-configured workstations will be provided, so there is no need to prepare for the course in any specific way. You can find more information and register for the training on the blackhat website. Please note that there will be only 2 public classes of this training this year – both during the Black Hat Briefings (28/29 and 30/31 of July). More classes will be available only in the form of on-site trainings for corporate customers.

Please also note that the number of seats is hard-limited by the number of available workstations, so we encourage registering early.

As for the other news – I have just quit COSEINC last week and I’m in the process of establishing a new security consulting and research company. For now I can only betray the name: Invisible Things Lab - expect more details to be posted here in the coming weeks :)
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Sunday, 1 April 2007

The Human Factor

Posted on 05:10 by Unknown
When you go to some security conferences, especially those targeted for management staff, you might get the impression that the only problem in the security field that mankind is facing today is… that we’re too stupid and we do not know how to use the technology properly. So, we, use those silly simple passwords, allow strangers to look at our laptop screens over our shoulders, happily provide our e-bank credentials or credit card numbers to whoever asks for them, etc… Sure, that’s true indeed – many people (both administrators and users) do silly mistakes and this is very bad and, of course, they should be trained not to do them.

However, we also face another problem these days… A problem of no less importance then “the human factor”. Namely, even if we were perfectly trained to use the technology and understood it very well, we would still be defenseless in many areas. Just because the technology is flawed!

Think about all those exploitable bugs in WiFi drivers in your laptop or email clients vulnerabilities (e.g. in your GPG/PGP software). The point is, you, as a user can not do anything to prevent exploitation of such bugs. And, of course, the worst thing is, that you don’t even have any reliable way to tell whether somebody actually successfully attacked you or not – see my previous post. None of the so called “industry best practices” can help – you just need to hope that your system hasn’t been 0wned. And this is really disturbing…

Of course, you can chose to believe in all this risk assessment pseudo-science, which can tell you that your system is “non-compromised with 98% probability” or you can try to comfort yourself because you know that your competition has no better security they you… ;)
Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Windows 7 seamless GUI integration coming to Qubes OS!
    Finally, after months of hard work, seamless mode for Windows 7 AppVMs is coming to Qubes OS! The new Windows Support Tools will be releas...
  • Converting untrusted PDFs into trusted ones: The Qubes Way
    Arguably one of the biggest challenges for desktop security is how to handle those overly complex PDFs, DOCs, and similar files, that are ...
  • The MS-DOS Security Model
    Back in the '80s, there was an operating system called MS-DOS . This ancient OS, some readers might not even remember it today, had a ve...
  • The three approaches to computer security
    If we looked at the computer systems and how they try to provide security, I think we could categorize those attempts into three broad categ...
  • Running Vista Every Day!
    More then a month ago I have installed Vista RTM on my primary laptop (x86 machine) and have been running it since that time almost every da...
  • Attacking Xen: DomU vs. Dom0 consideration
    As it usually happens, there is some confusion regarding the attacks presented in our Xen 0wning Trilogy. Some people think they are possibl...
  • Thoughts on Intel's upcoming Software Guard Extensions (Part 2)
    In the first part of this article published a few weeks ago, I have discussed the basics of Intel SGX technology, and also disc...
  • Qubes 2 Beta 2 has been released!
    Qubes R2 Beta 2 with KDE 4.9 environment (click for more screenshots) We're progressing fast and today I would like to anno...
  • Disposable VMs
    While we're still busy with some last few tickets left for Qubes Alpha 2 milestone, Rafal has already started working on a new feature ...
  • SVV Source Code Made Public!
    I decided to publish the full source code of my System Virginity Verifier. The license grants you to do anything with the code, including us...

Categories

  • attack
  • backdoors
  • bad guys attacking joanna
  • BIOS
  • bitlocker
  • challanges
  • chipset
  • cloud
  • company news
  • conferences
  • disk encryption
  • exploit
  • fighting for a better world
  • formal verification
  • general
  • hypervisor rootkits
  • nested virtualization
  • os security
  • personal
  • philosophical
  • qubes
  • rootkits
  • saving-the-world-afterhours
  • secure architecture
  • smm
  • tpm
  • trusted computing
  • trusted execution technology
  • usb
  • virtualization based rootkits
  • xen hacking
  • xen heap exploiting

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (17)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ►  2010 (15)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (21)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2008 (15)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ▼  2007 (15)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ▼  April (2)
      • Understanding Stealth Malware
      • The Human Factor
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile