Window 7 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 13 September 2010

On Thin Clients Security

Posted on 07:35 by Unknown
I'm constantly being asked about it, and so I thought I would write a handy blog post, so I could just referrer to it in the future, when yet anther person asks me if I think the use of Thin Clients is a game-changer to desktop security...

It is not! Thin Clients do not improve your desktop security in any way, and that's because:

  1. You still run a regular full-blown OS, such as Widows and all the regular applications, such as those buggy PDF readers, Web browsers, etc - it's just you run them all on some corporate server, rather on your laptop. The fact that you run the OS on the corporate server, doesn't make it any less prone to compromises, compared to if you run it locally on your laptop.


  2. A compromise of your laptop, even if it's just a dump terminal, is still fatal! This is because if your laptop's kernel (or MBR, or BIOS, or some PCI device's firmware, or GPU) is compromised, the attacker can intercept/steal/spoof all the data that you work on remotely, because it is still your laptop that processes the input (keystrokes, mouse events) and output (pixels). So, an Evil Maid attack on your laptop when you use it as a Thin Client, would be just as devastating, as it is otherwise (and don't fool yourselves that crypto tokens can help)

We really need secure end-user systems, even if we just want to use them as dump terminals only! There is really no way we could skip this step (and e.g. focus only on infrastructure, or services security).
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in general, os security | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Windows 7 seamless GUI integration coming to Qubes OS!
    Finally, after months of hard work, seamless mode for Windows 7 AppVMs is coming to Qubes OS! The new Windows Support Tools will be releas...
  • Microsoft executive "rebuts" our research!
    Ah, there is no feeling like seeing your name in the news when drinking your morning coffee... In this piece some Steve Riley, a senior sec...
  • Handy Tool To Play with Windows Integrity Levels
    Mark Minasi wrote to me recently to point out that his new tool, chml , is capable of setting NoReadUp and NoExecuteUp policy on file objec...
  • We're ready for the Ptacek's challenge!
    Thomas Ptacek and company just came up with this funny challenge to test our Blue Pill rootkit. And, needles to say, the Invisible Things L...
  • Vista Security Model – A Big Joke?
    [ Update: if you came here from ZDNet or Slashdot - see the post about confusion above!] Today I saw a new post at Mark Russinovich’s blog...
  • Our Xen 0wning Trilogy Highlights
    Below you can find highlights of the three presentations, collectively referred to as "Xen 0wning Trilogy", that Alex, Rafal and I...
  • The three approaches to computer security
    If we looked at the computer systems and how they try to provide security, I think we could categorize those attempts into three broad categ...
  • Towards Verifiable Operating Systems
    Last week I gave a presentation at the 23rd Chaos Communication Congress in Berlin. Originally the presentation was supposed to be titled ...
  • Vegas Toys (Part I): The Ring -3 Tools
    We've just published the proof of concept code for the Alex's and Rafal's "Ring -3 Rootkits" talk, presented last mont...
  • Attacking Xen: DomU vs. Dom0 consideration
    As it usually happens, there is some confusion regarding the attacks presented in our Xen 0wning Trilogy. Some people think they are possibl...

Categories

  • attack
  • backdoors
  • bad guys attacking joanna
  • BIOS
  • bitlocker
  • challanges
  • chipset
  • cloud
  • company news
  • conferences
  • disk encryption
  • exploit
  • fighting for a better world
  • formal verification
  • general
  • hypervisor rootkits
  • nested virtualization
  • os security
  • personal
  • philosophical
  • qubes
  • rootkits
  • saving-the-world-afterhours
  • secure architecture
  • smm
  • tpm
  • trusted computing
  • trusted execution technology
  • usb
  • virtualization based rootkits
  • xen hacking
  • xen heap exploiting

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (17)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ▼  2010 (15)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ▼  September (4)
      • ITL is hiring!
      • On Thin Clients Security
      • (Un)Trusting your GUI Subsystem
      • Qubes, Qubes Pro, and the Future...
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (21)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2008 (15)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2007 (15)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile